Failure Modes Analysis for Batch Processing¶
Overview¶
This document analyzes all potential failure modes in the batch processing system and provides solutions to ensure exactly-once processing for each transaction.
🚨 Critical Failure Modes¶
1. Lambda Execution Failures¶
A. Lambda Timeout¶
- Scenario: Batch processing takes longer than Lambda timeout (15 minutes max)
- Impact: All events in batch are lost
- Detection: CloudWatch timeout metrics
- Solution:
- Implement checkpointing every 100 events
- Use Step Functions for long-running batches
- Split large batches into smaller chunks
B. Lambda Memory Exhaustion¶
- Scenario: Batch size too large for Lambda memory
- Impact: Lambda crashes, events lost
- Detection: CloudWatch memory metrics
- Solution:
- Limit batch size based on memory usage
- Implement memory monitoring
- Use ECS/Fargate for large batches
C. Lambda Cold Start¶
- Scenario: New Lambda instance, slow startup
- Impact: Increased latency, potential timeout
- Detection: CloudWatch duration metrics
- Solution:
- Keep Lambda warm with scheduled invocations
- Use Provisioned Concurrency
2. Database Operation Failures¶
A. DynamoDB Throttling¶
- Scenario: Exceeding DynamoDB read/write capacity
- Impact: Batch operations fail, partial data loss
- Detection: DynamoDB throttled requests metric
- Solution:
- Implement exponential backoff
- Use DynamoDB on-demand capacity
- Implement circuit breaker pattern
B. DynamoDB Partial Batch Failures¶
- Scenario: Some items in batch write fail, others succeed
- Impact: Inconsistent state, duplicate processing risk
- Detection: Batch write response with unprocessed items
- Solution:
- Implement idempotency keys
- Use conditional writes
- Retry failed items individually
C. DynamoDB Connection Failures¶
- Scenario: Network issues, DynamoDB service unavailable
- Impact: Complete batch failure
- Detection: Connection timeout errors
- Solution:
- Implement retry logic with exponential backoff
- Use multiple AWS regions
- Implement circuit breaker
3. Data Processing Failures¶
A. Individual Event Processing Failures¶
- Scenario: Rule evaluation fails for specific events
- Impact: Some events fail, others succeed
- Detection: Exception handling in rule engine
- Solution:
- Isolate failures to individual events
- Implement dead letter queue for failed events
- Provide detailed error logging
B. Metadata Loading Failures¶
- Scenario: Cannot load user/merchant metadata
- Impact: Rule evaluation may fail or use default values
- Detection: Metadata loader exceptions
- Solution:
- Implement fallback values
- Cache metadata with TTL
- Retry metadata loading
C. Rule Configuration Errors¶
- Scenario: Invalid rule definitions
- Impact: Rule evaluation fails
- Detection: Rule validation errors
- Solution:
- Validate rules before deployment
- Implement rule versioning
- Use default rules as fallback
4. Message Queue Failures¶
A. SQS Message Processing Failures¶
- Scenario: Cannot parse SQS messages
- Impact: Events lost or duplicated
- Detection: JSON parsing errors
- Solution:
- Implement message validation
- Use SQS dead letter queue
- Implement message deduplication
B. SQS Visibility Timeout¶
- Scenario: Processing takes longer than visibility timeout
- Impact: Messages reprocessed, duplicates
- Detection: SQS visibility timeout metrics
- Solution:
- Extend visibility timeout for large batches
- Implement heartbeat mechanism
- Use SQS long polling
5. External Service Failures¶
A. Third-party API Failures¶
- Scenario: External services (fraud detection, etc.) unavailable
- Impact: Processing blocked or incomplete
- Detection: HTTP timeout/error responses
- Solution:
- Implement circuit breaker pattern
- Use fallback logic
- Async processing for non-critical services
🔄 Exactly-Once Processing Requirements¶
Idempotency Keys¶
Each event must have a unique idempotency key:
Processing States¶
Events must track processing state:
- PENDING: Initial state
- PROCESSING: Currently being processed
- PROCESSED: Successfully completed
- FAILED: Processing failed
- RETRY: Scheduled for retry
Checkpointing¶
Implement checkpointing every N events:
Dead Letter Queue (DLQ)¶
Failed events must be sent to DLQ for manual review:
🛡️ Failure Handling Strategies¶
1. Circuit Breaker Pattern¶
class CircuitBreaker:
def __init__(self, failure_threshold=5, timeout=60):
self.failure_count = 0
self.failure_threshold = failure_threshold
self.timeout = timeout
self.last_failure_time = None
self.state = "CLOSED" # CLOSED, OPEN, HALF_OPEN
2. Exponential Backoff¶
def exponential_backoff(attempt, base_delay=1, max_delay=60):
delay = min(base_delay * (2 ** attempt), max_delay)
return delay + random.uniform(0, 1)
3. Batch Retry Logic¶
def retry_batch_operation(operation, items, max_retries=3):
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
result = operation(items)
return result
except Exception as e:
if attempt == max_retries - 1:
raise
delay = exponential_backoff(attempt)
time.sleep(delay)
4. Idempotency Check¶
def check_idempotency(event_id, idempotency_key):
existing = dynamodb_client.get_item(
table_name=settings.events_table_name,
key={"event_id": event_id}
)
if existing and existing.get("idempotency_key") == idempotency_key:
return True # Already processed
return False
📊 Monitoring and Alerting¶
Key Metrics to Monitor¶
- Lambda Metrics
- Duration
- Memory usage
- Error rate
-
Throttles
-
DynamoDB Metrics
- Read/Write capacity units
- Throttled requests
-
Error rate
-
SQS Metrics
- Message age
- Visibility timeout
-
DLQ message count
-
Business Metrics
- Events processed per second
- Processing success rate
- Average processing time
Alerting Thresholds¶
- Lambda error rate > 1%
- DynamoDB throttling > 0.1%
- SQS DLQ messages > 10
- Processing latency > 30 seconds
🔧 Implementation Recommendations¶
1. Enhanced Batch Processor¶
- Implement checkpointing
- Add circuit breakers
- Use idempotency keys
- Implement retry logic
2. Dead Letter Queue¶
- Create separate DLQ for each failure type
- Implement DLQ processing Lambda
- Add manual review interface
3. Monitoring Dashboard¶
- Create CloudWatch dashboard
- Set up alarms
- Implement log aggregation
4. Testing Strategy¶
- Chaos engineering tests
- Load testing
- Failure injection tests
- Idempotency tests